The East-West-Link – a “one stop shop” for suppressing public opinion?

As if the East-West Link project would not be controversial enough as such, things are likely to get worse as concerned citizens could learn from a comment published yesterday in The Age. Considering the content’s significance one can’t help to wonder if democracy in Victoria is only meant to be a placeholder or if it truly exists.

Not that there is much need to talk more about the East-West Link itself, I believe there has been said enough. Besides, the quality of the information one can gather from its website speaks against the project anyway. What is more of concern is the fact that the Napthine government has plans to shut the mouth of those who do not agree with this absolutely irresponsible project. According to The Age “the government will also introduce what it calls a ”risk-based” assessment regime, where community issues deemed to be ”marginal” or of ”little consequence” will not be examined before proceeding”, words that usually force Amnesty International to jump at those who uttered them. However, as we can reader further “Mr Mulder said it [the parliament] did not believe this would threaten Victoria’s charter of human rights, because members of the public were not restricted from making written submissions.”

What sounds like dictatorship to anyone with some critical thinking lies miles apart from ideals of a democracy. I have argued before that public participation in Australia doesn’t get the room it deserves when it comes to assessments of future developments, and things seem to be particularly bad in this case. One only needs to participate in the community survey: a survey that shows how bias can fundamentally change the outcome of a survey. To be honest, this survey would make a very good example for ”how-not-to” design a survey in whatever schoolbook.
True, Melbournians like their cars and one is likely to win their hearts if they are promised more roads. However, this doesn’t mean that Melbournians are stupid, and even if the survey doesn’t mention alternatives nor talk about costs, people can put two and two together. The Age has warned tax payers about the consequences of the project before the government considered to silence us. It might estrange readers not to find any word about costs on the government’s website. However, digging a bit deeper, they soon might find that there is likely a strategy behind it.

All the information we can find is somehow an embarrassment and not at all in line with what best practice guidelines teach us. Not that one has to be an expert, even a layman can see the difference if they compare the quality with a similar project currently under evaluation in the UK. There, the public can learn about the costs and economic benefits, both explained in detail and not just in vague assumptions as is the case with the East-West Link. Even an equity analysis is available. There are a number of very informative documents such as a draft environmental statement with different degrees of complexity to address the public as a whole and taking into account that “the public” is not a homogenous group. All these documents are available well before the approval and with enough time for the public to study them and react.

Yet, another point is quite different in the UK development: it considers current global environment concerns and is aligned with measures to prevent further degradation. True that not everyone likes public transport in Melbourne, but that is not because Melbournians do not care for the environment, it is simply because the public transport system is worse than those in developing countries. Needless to say that the AUD$ 8 billions calculated for the East-West-Link could significantly improve it, a vision that only makes sense for people who think a bit further than the project team:  “In the next 20 years, Melbournians will make nearly 19 million person-trips around the city every day, an increase of 34 per cent on 2006 levels. Nearly 14 million of these trips will be made by car (74 per cent of all trips).” A remarkable analysis!

As others have stated before “the Stone Age didn’t end because we ran out of stones”. It’s probably about time to think into the future instead of holding on to the past and knowing that “the East West Link would be one of the largest infrastructure projects ever constructed in Melbourne” as we can read on the project’s website, the government should be happy that the public expresses its feelings about it. After all, we still live in a democracy.

If there are rallies against the East-West-Link then it’s not that Melbournians do not know what to do on their weekends, it’s simply because we think that we deserve a voice. No government or project developer will shut us up – at least not as long as we live in a democracy!


About blaubear

Born in 1973 in a small village in rural Switzerland and into a society largely dominated by cows (not only was the human population of one-hundred-and-forty outnumbered by them, but politics were driven by unreasonable subsidies for diary products) I was connected with nature from early age on. Observing nature on one hand and the deficiencies of a dysfunctional Swiss agricultural policy with farmers that had lost connection to the land that provided their income on the other, I soon started to question society and the meaning of life. Suffering also under a farcical public education I developed curiosity to discover on my own. That was how I soon learned that little of what I had been taught was true. Skepticism and interaction with people from for me new cultures fostered my interest for the world and eagerness to leave a life shaped by federalistic layman-ship. At the age of twenty-three I hit the road for the first time, an event that later translated into passion. Traveling between cultures has since become part of my life. At the age of thirty-three I finally realized my dream and did a degree in Environmental Engineering from which I graduated in 2009, only to leave Switzerland once more for my "real home" Spain. Unfortunately, the stay was a short one: a couple of months later I was offered a job in Southeast Asia, where I worked and also lived (with some interruptions, e.g. I live in Melbourne since late 2012) ever since. Having worked for a Japanese company earlier in my life, I soon felt captured again by Asian culture and thinking which makes a lovely contrast to my European heritage. My journey through different countries and cultures has taught me that regardless of how different our thinking and values are, no matter what approaches we take, we all can learn from each other. And if we are open enough to see the common instead of pointing out the differences, then we have a chance to live in harmony and peace: Life is all about integration, not exclusion! It's an old wisdom that "knowledge is power", as such I never get tired of being around new people, having interesting talks, and reading lots of good books. I hope that my blog can contribute to the conversation.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The East-West-Link – a “one stop shop” for suppressing public opinion?

  1. mandy curtain says:

    No no no to east west link in Melbourne Australia stop wasting money and the environment

  2. Pingback: The East West Link dud. Premier Denis Napthine’s undemocratic approach to a questionable project. | Ideas for a greener environment, a fairer society and a future driven by sustainability

  3. Pingback: A new act in the EWL burlesque | Ideas for a greener environment, a fairer society and a future driven by sustainability

  4. Pingback: Of mateship and machismo. Driving in Australia. | Ideas for a greener environment, a fairer society and a future driven by sustainability

  5. Pingback: Humanity vs The Australian Government. Or how to save the Great Barrier Reef. | Ideas for a greener environment, a fairer society and a future driven by sustainability

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s